Are Mormons Christians?

How do you define "Christianity"? Obviously, there are many sects who refer to themselves as "Christians" who have radically different opinions on crucial doctrines and they can't all be right. So what's the standard? Only a group who worships the true God can be considered Christian. Does that mean any religion who worships a god with the same name as the God in the Bible is really Christian? Of course not, anybody can give a false god a new name, but that doesn't change what it is. Thus, the only way to test a religion is to hold it up next to the God in the Bible. So... does the god of Mormonism (LDS Church) match the description of God in the Bible? I'll list here the differing viewpoints on one aspect of God's nature that the LDS church holds, and then let you decide how important the difference is. Is it a mere technicality? Or does it make all the difference between worship of the supreme God of the universe, and just another "false prophet" proclaiming another "false christ"?

The LDS church holds several doctrines which differ from those held by Biblical Christianity, but perhaps the most concerning is this: IS God the supreme deity of the universe, or just one of countless gods and goddesses speckled throughout space and time?

Here's what LDS church leaders have said:

1.) According to Joseph Smith: "The doctrine of a plurality of Gods is prominent in the Bible. The heads of the Gods appointed our God for us...you have got to learn how to be Gods yourselves...the same as all Gods have done before you" (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.370-372, 346).

2.) Mormon Prophet Brigham Young wrote: "How many Gods there are, I do not know. But there never was a time when there were not Gods" (Journal of Discourses v.7, p.333).

3.) Mormon Apostle and apologist Bruce McConkie states: "Three separate personages---Father, Son, and Holy Ghost---comprise the Godhead...As each of these persons is a God, it is evident from this standpoint alone, that a plurality of Gods exists. To us...these three are the only Gods we worship" (Mormon Doctrine, p.576-577).

4.) Mormon Apostle Orson Pratt wrote "there are more gods than there are particles of matter" (Journal of Discourses, vol.2, p.345).

5.) Joseph Smith describes the creation of the earth: "And they said, 'Let there be light'...And the Gods pronounced the dry land...And the Gods organized the earth...And the Gods planted a garden in Eden" (Pearl of Great Price, Abraham 4:3,10,25; 5:8). A reference to a plurality of 'Gods' occurs at least 43 times in the book of Abraham.

Contrary to Joseph Smith’s claim that this doctrine is ever-present in the Bible, however, it seems evident to me that the Bible has always taught that there is ONE God, and only one:

Isaiah 44:6 Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.

Isaiah 45:21 Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take counsel together: who hath declared this from ancient time? who hath told it from that time? have not I the LORD? and there is no God else beside me; a just God and a Savior; there is none beside me.

Isaiah 45:22 Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and there is none else.

Isaiah 48:12 Hearken unto me, O Jacob and Israel, my called; I am he; I am the first, I also am the last.

Mark 12:32 And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he:

Isaiah 46:9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,

Isaiah 43:10 Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.

Hebrews 6:13 For when God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he swore by himself,

Nehemiah 9:6 Thou, even thou, art LORD alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshipeth thee.

Isaiah 44:8 Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.

Deuteronomy 6:4 Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

The typical response to these verses is 1 Corinthians 8:5:

For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,)

While this verse, read out of context as it is shown above, would appear to allude to other gods, the so-called “gods” being spoken of in this verse are clearly identified in verse 4 as the false gods of the heathen. Read the verse in context:

1 Corinthians 8:4 As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one.
1 Corinthians 8:5 For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,)

Your convictions will be stronger if you draw your own conclusions, so I'm not going to spoon-feed them to you. If you want your opinion to remain untainted, then stop reading here, because in the following paragraph I'll offer my perspective.

* * *

The Bible never teaches that there are a "plurality of gods", and to suggest that there is would seem to me to serve only to lower God's stature in the grand scheme of things, but that's just my take on it. As Mormons also deny that Jesus was God in the flesh, deeming him as no more than the first-born of many "spirit children", it would seem to me that the Mormon Jesus is not the same as the Jesus in the Bible. The Jesus in the Bible was prayed to, worshipped, and proclaimed "I and the Father are one". Any Jesus other than the Jesus in the Bible has neither the power nor the right to forgive our sins, and it is for this reason that my sincerest prayers go out to the Mormons... The Bible warns us of false christs in Matthew 24:24 "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect." Please remember, members of the LDS church are, for the most part at least, sincere and truly seeking the one whom they have been told is "god", and they really are well-intentioned. Likewise, don't get sidetracked trying to convince a Mormon he isn't a Christian, because based off the definition of Christianity that his church leaders have offered him, he is positive that he is and he has a strong testimony to back it up. I have no doubt that a spirit has come to many of them and affirmed in their hearts the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon, but this spirit was not the Holy Spirit. The Bible tells us to "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." (1 Thessalonians 5:21)The word "δοκιμάζω", translated "Prove", literally means to "test". We are to test the spirits that come to us by the Word of God. This is comparable to the golden lamp stand and bread which were always to be kept in the same room in the temple (see blog entry: You Are God's Holy Temple) The bread represents the presence of God, and the lampstand represents the Word, and they could never be separated. Mormons have failed to test the spirit which "witnessed" to them of the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon, and without realizing this they will never be willing to reject this false Christ and come to know the true God who knows and loves them and wants to save them from their sin and the eternal destruction they have earned, as we all have, because of it.

In Christ's Love,
Matthew

Mitt Romney: America's Next President?

In a conversation I had recently with a member of the LDS (Latter-Day Saints - a.k.a. "mormon") church, the girl I was speaking with suddenly became very serious. She looked me straight in the eyes and said with surprising confidence "I know who the next president will be." While she didn't disclose the name of the candidate she was referring to, the context of the conversation we were having, dominantly religious, made the implication clear.

Mitt Romney, former Massachusetts governor and now a semi-dominant candidate for the G.O.P. presidential nomination, has earned much of his popularity, as well as criticism, from his religious stance. As a member of the LDS church, he represents conservative values and, in the eyes of fellow church members, LDS representation in the nation's capital. Is the church's brazen confidence in Romney warranted? In polls of G.O.P. voters, Romney would appear to be steadily maintaining his standing between 3rd and 5th place in the race for the Republican nomination. While considering this things may be looking a little bleak for Romney, the public opinion may shift. He is almost guaranteed the support of the LDS church, a relatively impressive chunk of the U.S. population (as of 2002, mormons made up approx. 2% of the U.S. population). With at least 2 percent of the vote practically handed to him, Romney is bound to continue to build support and may eventually become a more formiddable threat to the prominent G.O.P. candidates such as Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson. Will Mitt Romney be the nation's next president? It is not completely out of the question, especially with the enormous financial backing available to him (he raised $23 million in the first quarter, more than any other G.O.P. candidate). Perhaps the better question is "should Mitt Romney be the nation's next president?"

While Romney's mantra throughout his campaign thus far has been that voters should not consider his religion when voting, he also continually seeks, and receives, strong support from his church. The fact of the matter is, religion should NOT be a part of the voters' decisions. In my humble opinion, Romney is an expert at speaking out of both sides of his mouth. I fear that if Romney is elected, it will be because of his religious stance... a point which has been largely undisputed by LDS church members, stating they will vote for Romney because of his membership in the church. If you as a voter wish that Romney be elected, then by all means vote for him. But NOT because of his religious stance. I would implore you to choose which candidate you support based upon political stances, not religious biases (whether for OR against religion). Religion is of course a good indicator of moral perspective, but should only be considered as one of many factors.

Does this mean politicians with religious affiliations shouldn't be president? Of course not! As a Christian myself, I would gladly vote for a Christian candidate, but not simply because he or she is a Christian. I would also encourage members of the LDS church to vote for Romney if they agree with him politically, but NEVER because he is a Latter-Day Saint. Likewise, I am confident that many Democratic voters will vote in favor of Sen. Hilary Clinton, but I also know that a large majority will not do so because they completely agree with her politics, but instead many feminists will vote for Clinton because she is a woman and they are "ready for change". This is a foolish reason to vote for any candidate and these voters will have no one to blame but themselves if they later discover that Clinton varies drastically from their views on key issues.